‘Footfairy’ Ending, Explained: What Does The End Credits Scene Signify?

YT Good - Viral

Who is the actual killer in Foot Fairy?

In the seven years that follow, Vivaan is operating his own security company after quitting his employment, as shown in the movie. 

Everything appears to be tranquil now that everyone has moved on with their lives. Vivaan walks up to the railroad tracks where the murders took place and just stands there, staring. 

He and the other guy are gazing at the railroad tracks when a kid asks them why. The youngster admits, after some prodding, that the other guy said he had left a bag there decades earlier and was only inspecting the location. It is clear to Vivaan that he is referring to the FootFairy.

Where did the man go, he queries. The youngster gestures in the direction of where the railroad lines will be after the movie is over.

We observe a woman walking in the final scene. Both the location and the woman are not in India.

When she turns around after being hit with a snowball, a plastic cap is placed over her head, and the screen goes black. This indicates that the Footfairy is still in business, although in another nation.

Vivaan: We can't abandon the notion that Vivaan may be the footfairy. He was aware of the timings of his neighbor's daughter, so it seemed strange that he was fixated on accusing Joshua of being the culprit. 

At one point, Devika questions if Vivaan believes Joshua is the murderer out of genuine conviction or simply because it makes the investigation simpler. However, there is the memorial service scene where the real FootFairy appears.

Was that a convenient red herring he used? He probably had to stop operating once Joshua filed a slander lawsuit, but the accomplice went rogue. 

In the closing credits, we saw the FootFairy in a distant country, yet Vivaan is a resident of Bangalore with his family.

Perhaps we should take the child's word for it, keep things straightforward, and assume that Vivaan is not the offender but rather someone else. If they decide to create a sequel, then is when we will find out. If not, we shall have to fight against our theories.

Joshua: From the outset, all the fingers are pointed at him. Two months before to the killings, he opened his cafe. 

He had a method for focusing on certain victims, and when he shuttered his café and left, the killings truly ceased. 

Not to mention the fact that his girlfriend claimed she thought he was responsible for the killings because of the way he appeared to enjoy choking her. When Vivaan finds the girl's body and assaults Joshua for admitting to killing her, Joshua responds that he has.

But he acknowledges that he is merely saying it to satisfy Vivaan's curiosity. Harsh arrives with the forensic findings just in time for him to shoot him. Joshua's DNA does not match that of the FootFairy.

If he had a partner, as we previously theorised, this would make sense. However, a part of us thinks it is too apparent. He just doesn't seem to be the escaped criminal. He was upfront about his foot fetish, though, and was thinking of something more specific.

For these reasons, if the makers decide to make him the killer in a sequel, should it happen, we are not going to be satisfied with that.

Rishabh is Vivaan's coworker, but we don't instantly think about him until two crucial details are made clear in the closing few minutes: first, Rishabh is in Russia; and second, the end titles depict the FootFairy functioning overseas.

This brings to mind the fact that he was the one who directed Vivaan to Joshua. The fact that the victims had visited the same burger restaurant a week or two before to their deaths is such an improbable connection to make.

If you weren't the genuine genius, how could you have known this knowledge in the first place? He was always the first to arrive at a crime scene. 

Also keep in mind that the FootFairy shrewdly evaded inquiry techniques while appearing to comprehend them. That can imply that he is an individual with expertise of police tactics or investigations. 

He was present when the FootFairy served Vanessa, so that's true, but might it have been a cover or a complete red herring?